@LadyRain I think you asked me a question a couple of posts back ("автора графиков спросить?"), but google translate did a very poor job with your post. Could you try asking it in a different way?
Работает проверка заявок DV-2024, принятых осенью 2022 года
Интервью победителей DV-2024 — с 01.10.2023 до 30.09.2024
Регистрация заявок DV-2025 — с 4 октября по 7 ноября 2023 года
Проверка результатов DV-2025 — с 4 мая 2024 года
Октябрь 2023: 4500
Сентябрь 2023: 32000
Август 2023: 32000
А если мы выиграем грин карту, но за два года ожидания у нас родится ребенок, о котором мы ничего не указывали в заявке. Будет ли он иметь право на выезд?
ул. Октябрьская, 5, офис 108
Минск, Беларусь
тел. в офисе (017) 327-77-55
e-mail: info@greencard.by
полная контактная информация
06.04.2018 17:01:26
As a general remark: numbers that Britsimon calls "max case number" or numbers at which I cut my plots are not necessarily 100% accurate. When we initially scan the CEAC database we check all the case numbers until we reach a range where there are only holes. As an example, for DV2018 we scanned up to EU42000. Last case with 'At NVC' status is 2018EU39695. It means that every case number in range 39695 < x < 42000 is a hole. However, it does not prove that there aren't any cases above 42000. There were examples of isolated, singular cases in a very high range in past DVs.
@LadyRain I think you asked me a question a couple of posts back ("автора графиков спросить?"), but google translate did a very poor job with your post. Could you try asking it in a different way? |
|
|
04.04.2018 17:26:24
That was going to be my point DV15 is more similar to DV17 in terms of processing than DV17 to DV18. That's the reason I put DV15's data on my website: to show that DV18 is so different from both DV15 and DV17 that it doesn't really make sense to compare DV18 to previous years. Anyways, I usually try to refrain from commenting on other people's analyses. Occasionally though I see something I can't help to address. Nevertheless, the whole point of getting the data out publicly is for everybody to draw their own conclusions. Your guesses are as good as mine. |
|||
|
04.04.2018 16:24:07
If you think you made a small and insignificant error, compare number of "processed" cases for set range in DV15 in April and at the end... |
|||
|
04.04.2018 15:37:54
That's the state for October 2017 then. You cannot derive data for April from that dataset. There are a lot of cases with # < 22000 that were processed in May or later... |
|||
|
03.04.2018 19:26:04
That's the total number of cases with status "Ready" in CEAC database on 03/30/2018. It doesn't necessarily correspond to a specific month though, e.g. some cases turn ready in October and stay that way through the whole fiscal year. If you want to see specific number of cases processed each month, there are separate csv files at the bottom of the page. For EU there were / are: March - 1260 cases (that turned Ready) April - 934 cases May - 940 cases
Изменено:
|
|||
|
02.04.2018 22:50:10
There's a slider with a date below first graph. It changes both the content of all charts and the table. When you open the page for the first time it's always the "latest". Currently it's 03/30/2018. |
|||
|
02.04.2018 01:27:04
That table shows number of people, 18050 is case number cutoff. There's no explicit relation between those two numbers. Nothing's missing... |
|||
|
30.03.2018 18:28:54
Thanks for the effort! Y'all are really making difference! @xiaoandong you're like machine, congrats on getting into top10! We got all 'At NVC' cases, remaining captchas are for Ready/In Transit. I just published the results, along with complete list of 2NLs for May.
Изменено:
|
|||
|